Monday, September 20, 2010

OBAMA'S GOVT SNIPING FROM WITHIN

Lately, news stories on a republican “civil war” are as numerous as fruit flies in a Starbucks pastry display.

Apparently it is a new phenomenon when during primaries opposing candidates of the same party bicker and fight like the Kate Gosselin family.

“Tea Party’s wins fuel a ‘civil war’ within GOP” read a USA Today headline this past week.  CNN limped in today with their contribution to media setting the political narrative: “Inner-GOP sniping increases in wake of Tea Party successes.”  Geek-dom got its two cents in on the implosion of the GOP with Alan Colmes’ little liberal-and-proud-of-it  web posting.  The Huffington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Time Magazine, and Reuters are just a few that have joined the fray like stains on a Lewinski dress. 

I’m sure MSNBC’s contribution to non-professional journalism, Keithy Olbermann, has had his little thesaurus working overtime on this story line.

And it wouldn’t surprise me if ‘columnists DeWayne Wickham and Leonard Pitts (truly) found a black angle to the conventional press opinion by which to meet their deadlines.

Critics are trying to marginalize a segment of the Republican Party, placing them to the right of President Ronald Reagan and knocking them for their inexperience, as if to say, “Give me a break,” mimicking democratic President Bill Clinton’s criticism of democrat obama’s run for the White House.

Let’s focus one eye on the cracks that have appeared in the once-thought-impenetrable democrat controlled government of obama; “change has come to America.”

During the summer of 2009 debate over obama-care, democrats were in disarray over what the final plan ought to look like and obama’s democratic administration took to making deals and promises with democratic legislators to bribe…to gain their support and help make obama look presidential with a later afternoon Rose Garden signing.

ABC News reported in March 2010 that “tension at the highest levels of power” in the obama White House (Rahm “I want to be mayor” Emanuel vs. David Axelrod) brought a reminder from obama that they need to be “playing on the same team.”

A Washington Times story in June reported that Democratic strategist James “I am Bill Clinton’s brain” Carville was railing against democratic president obama for lack of action following the BP oil spill.  Democratic House member Charlie Rangel of NY also got into the act, telling an interviewer that the democratic administration of obama doesn’t have “the slightest clue” about what to do about the oil spill.

In July 2010, a Four-Star General is obama-retired over publically-aired disdain for the ways of his boss.
obama mouthpiece Robert Gibbs reportedly “infuriated” fellow Democrat Nancy “Plastic” Pelosi in July when he conceded that Democrats may lose control of the House of Representatives during midterm elections against the Republicans/Tea Partiers.

In August 2010, democratic non-tax-paying tax committee chairman Charlie Rangel (out of this one) took to the floor of the U.S. House to say “Hell no, I won’t go!” after democrat obama inferred that Rangle ought to resign his House seat rather than air the party’s dirty laundry in a quasi-public ethics trial.

On September 16, an Associated Press story reported that Democrats “are facing deep divisions in their nervous ranks” (emphasis mine) over whether to support no new taxes for anybody or nervously support democratic president obama’s call for further redistribution of wealth from those people and businesses making over $250,000.  Yes, Virginia, some democrats are now favoring Republican President George Bush’s tax cuts.

Democratic House member Chet Edwards of Texas is running a campaign ad that states: “When (democratic) president obama and (democrat) Nancy Pelosi pressured (democrat) Chet Edwards, Chet stood up to them and voted ‘no’ against their trillion-dollor healthcare bill.”

Currently, there are rumblings from fellow democrats that democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ought to take her tax-payer funded airplane and her petrified hair-do on a one way trip back to California.

On September 18 the Wall St. Journal ran a story over the “dissent” Pelosi is facing from her own party.

The story states that democratic members have signed a Republican petition for a vote to repeal the Pelosi-supported obama-care healthcare bill; 

other democrats (like Chet in Texas) are airing campaign ads that distance themselves from obama and Pelosi’s majority democrat run government; Alabama Democrat Bobby Bright’s ad states: “Bobby stands up to (democrat) Nancy Pelosi;” 

31 democrats joined republicans in the house to tell Pelosi they will support President George Bush’s tax cuts rather than her call for unity on obama’s spread-the-wealth tax plan; 

Democrat Congressman and Iraq War vet Brett Gordon of Tennessee said Pelosi should step down as Speaker and should not seek the top House role during the next legislative session (assuming she has the chance);

and democrat leadership aides are acknowledging that Pelosi is a “liability” to their party in this years elections.

Common sense and poll numbers tell us that all cannot be so sparkly in the land of Oz-obama.

There have been no obama beer-fests in the Rose Garden; no vacations for at least 3 weeks;  and no Amy –Carter like inquisitives from little Malia concerning the job obama is doing.

With RealClear Politics poll numbers showing more people disapproving of obama’s presidential performance than those still wearing rose-colored glasses and approving of his muddling blindly along, as well as nearly 75% of those polled feeling non-too impressed with the work of obama’s democratic controlled Congress, you can be sure that egos and self-preservation are making huge scratching noises in obama’s changed Washington D.C.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

OBAMA'S GOVT THREATENS FREE SPEECH

Threaten to burn the Qur’an; you get a call from obama asking you to reconsider.

Organize a protest against obama-care in a national park; you get jail.

The latter example may become reality if obama’s Department of Justice has its way.

A recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruling stated that requiring permission to speak your mind in a national park is just plain B.S.

obama’s Justice Department, led by Eric Holder, are threatening an appeal of this ruling so they can control which words will matter.

This is the same Eric Holder who as U.S. Deputy Attorney General in May 1999 advocated for the implementation of restrictions and regulations on internet speech.

Now as top law-dog (and lap-dog) in the country, and teamed up with someone who thinks words matter only when they come from his mouth, Holder is threatening to withhold a basic American right from someone who may want to discuss which First Lady has had the biggest over-bite with other visitors to the African American Civil War Memorial.

obama’s government argued in this case that restricting free speech in a National Park preserves the “peace and tranquility” of the park.

Do you think obama’s government would go after Martin Luther King for bringing all those people to the Lincoln Memorial and disturbing that park’s “peace and tranquility?”

Oh, hell no!

Glen Beck? Perhaps this is at the cusp of the obama government’s attack on free speech.

Eric Holder has probably not met with any TeaParty members to discuss ways of preventing partisan-motivated violence, however, United States Attonrey General Eric Holder¸ who’s own website promotes “Open Government,” did hold a meeting on September 7, 2010 with members of an “interfaith” group to discuss his department’s commitment in protecting their speech…the meeting was closed to the press.

Open government.

Freedom.

Words matter.

Read more: http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.create&editor=True#ixzz0zvdgfmry

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

OBAMA SHOWING CUBA NO LOVE

obama was against the Cuban embargo before he was for it.

A YouTube video shows obama in 2004 saying “it’s time to end the embargo” and “the Cuban embargo has failed.”

While campaigning, obama promised “real change in Cuba.”

While pandering to locals in a May 2008 Miami, Florida campaign appearance, where he “sprinkled his speech with Spanish words and phrases,” obama criticized Senator John McCain for “embracing failed policies” in the context of American/Cuban relations.

obama called for a “’new alliance of the Americas,” where neighbors such as Cuba would not be treated as “junior partners” in some idealistic socialist world order.

In this vein, obama promised that as president he would appoint a Special Envoy to the Americas to work with our southern neighbors, especially Cuba, in improving relations and in the end doing away with the embargo that has harmed the people of Cuba more than it has punished the government of Castro.

Our southern neighbors still await this appointment while the Middle East, Afghanistan/Pakistan, Sudan, and Haiti, to name a few, have been assigned special envoys by obama (makes you wonder what the hell Hillary Clinton is doing as Secretary of State).

Oh, there were rumors, such as Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd being offered the position. Might be logical, he will be out of a job in November.

obama said President George Bush’s policies were not “advancing freedom in Cuba.”

Currently, obama embraces the majority of those same policies toward Cuba…with the same effects.

McCain vowed to maintain the embargo until its communist government makes moves toward accepting human rights and democratic elections.

While castigating President George W. Bush, Senator John McCain, and Senator Hillary Clinton (and anyone else who wasn’t Cuban) for setting “preconditions” on meeting with enemy leaders, such as Raul Castro of Cuba, obama was setting his own.

obama has maintained the embargo - as president he hasn’t even called for its review by Congress - saying Cuba has not made the necessary positive steps by which he would consider ending the embargo.

obama has, however, made the traditional embargo policy less restrictive, his version of the carrot and stick game I assume, but that has been seen as doing too little.

obama campaigned on the ideal that when he becomes president his talk and hug approach to foreign policy would make despot states like Cuba change their ways and move toward democracy and an acceptance of human rights.

NPR released a story in August of this year which reported that international opinion was that the Castro regime has not, despite the hugs and talk from obama, made significant moves on its “ugly human rights record.

Thus, it appears obama’s policies with respect to Cuba are having no positive affect.

``It's important for the United States not just to talk to its friends, but also to talk to its enemies,'' obama said in a Texas debate against Senator Hillary Clinton.

The President of Cuba’s National Assembly sought to come to the U.S. to talk in October 2009…obama’s government denied him a visa.

Actions often matter more than words.

obama’s government has maintained Cuba on the list of foreign states that are sponsors of terrorism, saying in August of this year that “Havana provides safe haven to terrorists…”

More recently, the Trading With The Enemy Act (TWEA), which restricts trade, travel, and economic ventures with Cuba (Cuba is the only country this Act currently mentions), was due to expire on September 14, 2010.

obama extended the Act against Cuba on September 2, 2010 (Federal Register: September 7, 2010 Volume 75, Number 172,Presidential Documents, pp. 54457).

Yet on the website Cuba Travel USA, it is George W. Bush that is pictured with the label, “enemy of freedom to travel.”

Liberals around the globe have been calling on Cuba’s behalf for obama to lift the sanctions that have hurt the Cuban families of our US citizens.

Amnesty International called on obama not to extend TWEA, calling the sanctions against Cuba the “United States’ single most ridiculous and demonstrably failed foreign policy.”

Got nowhere with that.

Writing for the Washington Times, Eli Lake said that human rights groups are beginning to question obama’s “commitment” to their issues; “From a civil liberties perspective, [obama’s] report card shows an incomplete,” said Anthony Romero, executive director of the ACLU.

The National Foreign Trade Council has called on obama to open Cuba to all U.S. travelers and let U.S. companies work on the island.

Carlos Lazo, U.S. National Guardsmen, Cuban activist, and member of the board of directors of the Center for Democracy in the Americas, said “it is time to eliminate all restrictions on travel to Cuba for all Americans.”

Getting nowhere with that.

Steve Clemons, noting that Cuba, at this time, does not represent a great political prize for obama, yet urging him to change his policies, said, “Drop the counterproductive, compulsive obsessiveness with ‘conditionality.’ It does not work and undermines American interests.”

"When I lived in Cuba, they didn't let me leave the country," said Jose, a Bank of America employee who arrived here from Havana five years ago, who gave only his first name. "Now that I live in Miami, they don't let me go there. The two governments seem the same."

Read more: http://www.myspace.com/iosoluno

Read more: http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=510446062&blogId=538964257#ixzz0yxvnReGS